Pain Perception and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Self-Ligating Versus Conventional Orthodontic Treatment: A Comparative Clinical Study
Abstract
Background: Pain management and quality of life assessment are crucial considerations in orthodontic treatment planning. Self-ligating brackets have been proposed as an alternative to conventional brackets with potential benefits in patient comfort and treatment outcomes.
Objective: To compare pain perception levels and quality of life parameters between patients undergoing self-ligating versus conventional orthodontic treatment during the initial phases of therapy.
Methods: A prospective clinical study was conducted with 120 patients (aged 12-25 years) requiring comprehensive orthodontic treatment. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (n=60) received self-ligating brackets, and Group B (n=60) received conventional brackets. Pain perception was evaluated using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 2 hours, 24 hours, 3 days, and 7 days post-activation. Quality of life was assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months.
Results: Self-ligating bracket patients demonstrated significantly lower pain scores at all time intervals compared to conventional bracket patients (p<0.05). Mean VAS scores at 24 hours were 3.2±1.4 for self-ligating versus 5.8±2.1 for conventional brackets. Quality of life improvements were more pronounced in the self-ligating group, with OHIP-14 scores showing greater reduction in functional limitations and physical discomfort domains.
Conclusion: Self-ligating orthodontic systems provide superior patient comfort with reduced pain perception and enhanced quality of life compared to conventional brackets during initial treatment phases.
How to Cite This Article
Dr. Feng Li, Dr. Jacob A Brown (2025). Pain Perception and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Self-Ligating Versus Conventional Orthodontic Treatment: A Comparative Clinical Study . International Journal of Orthopedic and Orthodontic Research (IJOOR), 1(2), 14-17.